Category: Hot Trends: Developing Case Law
-
02.22.2021
ABA Issues New Guidance For Responses To Online Criticism
The American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility (“Committee”) recommends lawyers avoid responding to negative online reviews “because doing so may draw more attention to it and invite further response from an already unhappy critic,” Formal Opinion 496 said. If an attorney feels compelled to respond, however, the Committee reminds the legal community that […]
Read More -
01.15.2021
Property Transfer with No Retained Interest May Be Complete for Inheritance Tax Purposes Even If Grantor Still Benefits From Property
Shedlock v. Director, Div. of Taxation, No. A-5634-18T1, 2020 WL 5032512 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Aug. 26, 2020). In July 2013 and at the age of 87, Anthony Calleo (the “decedent”) deeded his two-family home (the “property”) to his nieces, Valerie Shedlock and Judith Solan, for less than $100. The deed included no specific provision […]
Read More -
01.15.2021
To Recover From a Fiduciary for Breach of Duty, the Loss Must be a Result of the Breach
In re Estate of Cenaffra, No. A-5731-17T1 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Sept. 9, 2020) Defendant was the executrix under the decedent’s last will and had also been the decedent’s agent under a power of attorney. The trial court granted plaintiff’s request to require defendant to provide an accounting for both roles. At trial, defendant invoked […]
Read More -
08.14.2020
Summary Judgment Granted in Undue Influence Claim After Plaintiff Failed to Provide Sufficient Evidence
In re Estate of Wilson, No. A-5350-18T2, 2020 WL 3527333 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. June 30, 2020). The Appellate Division affirmed the trial court’s ruling that a plaintiff’s speculation alone is insufficient to challenge testamentary capacity or show undue influence in a will’s execution. Stuart V.V. Wilson and his second wife, Amelia, were married […]
Read More -
08.14.2020
Complaint Dismissed in Will Contest After Plaintiff Fails to Appear
In re Estate of Liu, No. A-5063-18T1, 2020 WL 3527328 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. June 30, 2020). After James Liu failed to appear before the court, the Appellate Division affirmed the Chancery Division’s order dismissing his complaint contesting his father’s will. Decedent, Thomas Liu, died in December 2018 and was survived by his two […]
Read More -
05.18.2020
Will the Judiciary Re-Write the Rules for Retainers in Fee-Shifting Cases?
Balducci v. Cige, 240 N.J. 574 (2020) A former client filed an action against her former attorney for a declaratory judgment that the retainer agreement with him to represent her in a suit for damages under a Law Against Discrimination (LAD) lawsuit was unenforceable. The trial court declared the agreement unenforceable and dismissed the attorney’s […]
Read More -
05.18.2020
Under Doctrine of Probable Intent, Court Decides Beneficiary Designation
In re Estate of DeConca, A-1876-18T1, 2020 WL 1492556 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Mar. 27, 2020). This case highlights the need to ensure that charitable entities are correctly identified in estate planning documents. The co-executors of the estate filed a complaint seeking direction as to which charitable organization was the intended beneficiary of the […]
Read More -
04.02.2020
N.J. Supreme Court Settles Transfer Inheritance Tax Question
Estate of Van Riper v. Div. of Taxation, No. 082000, 2020 WL 558624 (N.J. Feb. 5, 2020). The Supreme Court affirmed the interpretation of New Jersey’s transfer inheritance tax statute that taxed the full value of a property transferred into an irrevocable trust, upon the death of the second spouse. Walter and Mary Van Riper […]
Read More -
04.02.2020
Filing Delay Bars Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim
In re Estate of Hursa, A-4801-17T1, 2020 WL 914706, (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Feb. 26, 2020). The plaintiff and her sister were the co-administrators of their mother’s estate. The sister had lived in the mother’s house from 2007 until her death in 2012. The plaintiff sued for breach of fiduciary duty, declaratory judgment, unjust […]
Read More -
04.02.2020
Co-Executors Suffer Consequences of Late Release Submission to Court
In re Estate of Hauke, A-5200-17T3, 2020 WL 1488675, (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Mar. 25, 2020). Co-executors in accounting action were not permitted to rely on a release, because they did not raise the release until the end of the trial, and the release did not apply anyhow. In addition, co-executors were not entitled […]
Read More