Category: Hot Trends: Developing Case Law
-
11.08.2022
Overcoming Presumption of Revocation, Unsigned Will Admitted for Probate
In the Matter of the Estate of Alfred Iapalucci, No. A-3670-20 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Oct. 5, 2022) The decedent died in 2020. In 2012, he executed a will (“Will”), healthcare power of attorney, and general power of attorney. He left the meeting with original powers of attorney, the sole original Will, as well […]
Read More -
11.02.2022
Absent Undue Influence, Appellate Division Upholds Disclaimer
In the Matter of the Estate of Warren A. Theckston, Docket No. A-3111-20 (N.J. Ct. App. Div. September 26, 2022) Warren A. Theckston (“Warren”) died intestate on November 26, 2019. Warren was survived by his four children, James, Jacqueline, Dorothy, and Theresa. James was estranged from his father for approximately fifteen (15) years at the […]
Read More -
09.28.2022
Don’t Forget the Basics: Appellate Division Finds Conflict of Interest in Complex, Multi-State Litigation
In the Matter of the Estate of Joseph Krivulka, Deceased, Nos. A-0863-20 & A-0803-21 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Aug. 26, 2022) This consolidated appeal centered on Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 1.9 and whether a former client gave informed written consent to a law firm’s representation of the client’s co-fiduciary as part of an […]
Read More -
09.19.2022
Litigant Compelled to Sign Mutual Releases Previously Agreed to in Open Court
In the Matter of the Estate of Wicker W. Doornbosch, Docket No. A-3225-19 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Aug. 19, 2022) This appeal arose out of probate litigation over the estate of Wicker W. Doornbosch, who died in 2016. The parties reached a settlement in open court. Counsel for appellant Farash put the terms on […]
Read More -
09.13.2022
Offer in Judgment Enforced as to All Claims; Litigants Can’t Pick and Choose
Puglia v. Phillips, Docket No. A-5367-18 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. August 15, 2022) This matter involves a mix of estate, property and procedural issues, including offers of judgment. The decedent’s children were the beneficiaries of her estate (“Estate”). A lengthy, acrimonious dispute arose regarding the Estate’s primary asset, a sixty-seven-acre farm (the Property). In […]
Read More -
06.29.2022
Case Summary: Standing and the Survivor’s Act
Chandler v. Kasper, A-2143-20 (App. Div. June 14, 2022) In Chandler v. Kasper, Docket No. A-2143-20 (App. Div. October 7, 2021), the Appellate Division dismissed a plaintiff’s cause of action under the Survivor’s Act (N.J.S.A. 2A:15-3), finding that the plaintiff (the decedent’s daughter) did not have standing to file a lawsuit under the Survivor’s Act […]
Read More -
06.29.2022
Case Summary: The Fiduciary Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in Pennsylvania
In Re: Trust Established under Agreement of Sarah Mellon Scaife, Deceased dated May 9, 1963, No. J-A06008-22, 2022 WL 1617129, (Pa. Super. May 23, 2022) In the context of litigation regarding objections to a trustees’ account, the estate of a deceased beneficiary sought production of unredacted versions of previously produced documents on the basis of […]
Read More -
06.07.2022
Case Summary: Claims Under New Jersey’s Uniform Unclaimed Property Act
Testa v. State, A-0693-20 (App. Div. April 20, 2022) Relying on the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (“UUPA”), N.J.S.A. §§ 46:30B-1 to -109, plaintiff alleged he was entitled to monies that had escheated from his deceased parents’ estates to the New Jersey Unclaimed Property Administration. At the trial level, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed under Rule 4:6-2(e), […]
Read More -
06.07.2022
Case Summary: The Rules of Procedure Apply to Everyone, Including Pro Se Litigants
In the Matter of the Irrevocable Trust of John L. Marchisotto, Deceased, Docket No. A-3453-19 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. April 21, 2022) Although courts are often patient with pro se litigants, this appeal serves as a reminder that the rules of civil procedure apply to all litigants and failing to comply with them can […]
Read More -
05.02.2022
No More Attorney-Review Requirement in Palimony Agreements in New Jersey
Moynihan v. Lynch, 250 N.J. 60 (March 8, 2022) This New Jersey Supreme Court decision addresses the validity of a palimony agreement. Beginning in 1997, plaintiff Kathleen Moynihan (“Kathleen”) and defendant Edward Lynch (“Edward”) were involved in a long-term romantic relationship. In 2000, Kathleen and her children moved into to a home in Bordentown, New […]
Read More